About PATH

Background

 

Many clients, especially in marginalized communities, rarely, if ever, are directly asked about their reproductive goals. This may be attributed to time constraints or lack of provider skill. Perhaps it also reflects provider bias about who should and who should not have children, and assumptions based on patient demographics like ethnicity, socioeconomic status, age, gender, sexual orientation, or relationship status. If reproductive goals are brought up, it is frequently in the context of “planning” and a binary frame that neither acknowledges nor respects the nuanced nature of people’s attitudes and feelings about their own reproduction. PATH is intentionally worded in a way that allows the patient to interpret the questions within their own context. This affords an opportunity for patients to consider, often for the first time, their reproductive goals and facilitates an honest, shared-decision making dialogue between patients and their providers.

What is PATH?

​​

Healthcare providers can comprehensive reproductive health by applying principles of patient-centered care. PATH is designed as a patient-centered framework with a shared-decision making model to be used with patients of any demographic without judgement.

PATH is an acronym:

PA --> parenting/pregnancy attitudes

 T --> timing

 H --> how important delaying pregnancy is

 

PATH asks the following three questions:

1) “Do you think you might like to have (more) children at some point?”

2) “When do you think that might be?”

3) “How important is it to you to prevent pregnancy (until then)?”

Follow up questions include:

·       "Since you have said_____, would you like to talk about ways to be prepared for a healthy pregnancy?"

·       "Do you have a sense of what’s important to you about your birth control?"

·       "How would that be for you?"

·       "Has that ever happened before?"

·       "How did you manage it?"

PATH facilitates active listening on the part of the provider which is paramount for patient-centered care and ultimately to ensure that patient’s voices are heard. Principles of patient-centered care applied with PATH inform equitable interactions that aim to help patients gain clarity about their reproductive goals, and support them in realizing those goals.

Planned VS. Unplanned Pregnancy

Considering parenting preferences in a binary, “intended versus unintended” or “planned vs. unplanned” frame, leaves out a spectrum of thoughts, feelings, and attitudes regarding parenting and pregnancy. Feelings about parenting and acceptability regarding pregnancy may be viewed with some combination of ambivalence, uncertainty, or indifference. Each of these attitudes are worth considering and are not inherently problematic. Human beings have internal motivations that inform actions, decisions and behaviors. Rather than problematizing the choices, PATH seeks to support someone as they clarify and express the internal motivations that drive their choices.

PATH focuses on desire to have a child rather than on pregnancy for several reasons. Perhaps most importantly, questioning that focuses on desire for pregnancy excludes people without a uterus and people who are not capable of or interested in pregnancy for themselves. The excluded person may want to have a child, but would be excluded from the conversation if the question was about desire for pregnancy. Also, in general, someone’s attitude regarding the acceptability of pregnancy is directly related to their thoughts and feelings about having a child.

Certainly a person’s sentiment about pregnancy could influence their thoughts or feelings about having a child and PATH allows for that with the last question. An example of this could be that a person unsure or concerned about fertility may not strongly avoid pregnancy, in part, in order to gain reassurance about fertility. This apparent ambivalence can be addressed within a PATH framework so as to support rather than judge the person who is simultaneously holding two seemingly inconsistent desires. A binary frame does not allow for consideration of this nuance. If the nuance is not invited into the conversation, it is unlikely that someone’s internal motivations will be clarified.

 

Add to this the fact that attitudes change over time. Even when someone expresses a strong desire to avoid or to get pregnant during one visit, these desires may shift as health, relationships, financial situations, and life opportunities change.

The framework we describe is versatile. The nuance with which the questions are asked is intentional, and allows for patients with lived experiences entirely different from provider experiences to be heard, affirmed, and supported by compassionate health care professionals.

Shared Decision Making

There is consensus in the current medical literature that when patients are choosing among more than one reasonable option, such as when choosing a contraceptive method, providers should assist their patients in making these decisions by helping them to identify their preferences in the context of their values and by providing them with relevant information in a way that the patient can understand and integrate.

A shared decision-making approach is associated with high levels of patient satisfaction in a wide variety of clinical settings including contraceptive counseling. It has been shown to increase a patient’s engagement in self-care as well as improve patient outcomes and health status. Shared decision making applied to contraception counseling is associated with increased satisfaction with method choice.

As stated in an article published about PATH entitled Beyond intent: exploring the association of contraceptive choice with questions about Pregnancy Attitudes, Timing, and How Important is pregnancy prevention:

“The goal of client-centered contraceptive counseling is a shared decision-making process.  The process is designed to identify contraceptive methods that are in line with patient preferences, goals and values as well as meeting emotional and physical health needs and addressing financial limitations. Clinicians provide information regarding method efficacy, side effects, duration of typical use, etc. While this information can inform a client’s decision to initiate a specific method, that decision is entirely theirs to make” (Geist, et al., 2019.)

PATH offers the opportunity for providers and their patients to collaborate on clarifying the patient’s reproductive goals, and to come up with next steps for that patient, taking into account a variety of life circumstances. Each patient is different, so there is not a one-size fits all solution to counseling. The PATH framework is designed to honor these differences and incorporates a variety of techniques to tailor the counseling conversation to each patient.  

PATH Partners​

PATH is currently being implemented in a variety of ways to create health equity nationwide, and continues to expand its reach with newfound partnerships.  PATH hopes to address the needed shift in how we as health care and public health professionals, approach reproductive health. Rather than claiming that unintended pregnancy is a crisis, we can move forward with the goal of advancing rights through the lens of reproductive justice, ensuring all individuals have the knowledge, access to services, and freedom to decide the number, spacing, and timing of their children.

© 2020 Envision SRH.  All Rights Reserved.